Reply To This Post         Return to Posts Index           VegSource Home


From: gary (206.113.192.12)
Subject:         Re: what recent slanderous comments?
Date: September 13, 2014 at 11:58 pm PST

In Reply to: Re: what recent slanderous comments? posted by Dr Gosia O'Reilly on September 13, 2014 at 11:41 pm:

What I will say is that

. I think it was inappropriate for you to reference
that lady, as she was quite a disturbed individual
imo.

. I do not condone (even though in his mind he had
a point to make) his comment regarding you in your
link yet there are many options as to how to
respond to that sort of thing. Perhaps it could be
ignored?

. Probably good not to spend a lot of time trying
to control others behavior, as many people seem to
do to the detriment of all.

. The only Quacks are those who listen to quacks.
But people do not seem to want to take personal
responsibility for their own lives. I do not
accept the "we must protect the impressionable
young girls from quack advice". That they are too
easily swayed is their problem that they (or their
parents) should have/should attend to. We may as
well say that atkins and mcdougall and others are
quacks as well.


Reply To This Post         Return to Posts Index           VegSource Home


Follow Ups:



Post Reply

Name:
E-mail: (optional)
Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL: