Custom Search


Reply To This Post         Return to Posts Index           VegSource Home

From: gary (
Subject:         Re: To The Sproutarian - THE METHOD...the new wave
Date: September 21, 2014 at 7:21 pm PST

In Reply to: Re: To The Sproutarian - THE METHOD...the new wave posted by The Sproutarian on September 21, 2014 at 5:00 pm:

>I will never understand high fruit diets. Most
fruit is not fresh straight off the tree so it is
prone to post harvest deterioration, and given it
is low nutrient and not properly tree ripened it
is a highly unbalanced starvation diet imo.

(imo) opinion is not the same as experience
(ime), which i have, and you apparently don't.
fruit is of good enough quality to thrive as many

>Fruit is o.k for a snack IF it is ripe and
straight from the tree only.

statements like this absent any evidence have no

>The failure for many to thrive on much of this
dead unbalanced food does not surprise me at all.

there is more than one reason for people not to
thrive, as I said. you concluding that poor
quality is the sole reason is submitted absent
evidence and ignores the other reasons.

>Gabriel Coisens says picked fruit will lose much
of it's energy after 2 - 3 days, and Brian
Clement says it is next to useless after 2 - 3
weeks and will kill you. And yes, we see many
people living lkargely on fruit who are literally
killing themselves and they bomb out.

not my experience. and cousens and clement are
pseudo scientists.

>The people who do well on fruit diets are the
exception to the rule.

people who climb to the top of everest are the
exception to the rule.

>The high fruit diet might be hard, but hardly
anyone can live like that

I await your research study showing the data from
your survey, otherwise it's just more unsupported

>, so if people are having trouble l would
suggest being open to other ideas. If they are
set on a high fruit diet then that is their
decision, but it is good to look at different
opotions given the lousy reputation of the
massive failure of people to thrive on high fruit

being open to other ideas is good. telling them
to eat as you do is foolish.

"massive failure" again is submitted without

>We want lots of good protective foods that are

I will correct your statement above for you.

"We want lots of good protective foods that are
FRESH enough."

you may not be aware that primates in the wild DO

>Science states that fruit is less protective
against disease compared with beans and greens.

You have not the slightest idea of what creates
disease. one does not require foods to "protect"
- one merely needs to avoid those things that
create disease.

>I am not here to argue, l am just stating my
beliefs here. I know you and others will be
strictly opposed to my ideas and l am cool with

beliefs are not of much value. facts would be
more welcome, otherwise maybe less statements
masquerading as fact.

take care and have a good day.

Reply To This Post         Return to Posts Index           VegSource Home

Follow Ups:


Post Reply

E-mail: (optional)


Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

See spam or
inappropriate posts?
Please let us know.

Want to see more videos? Subscribe to VegSource!

Every time we post a new video, we'll send you a notice by e-mail.

No spam ever and you can easily unsubscribe at anytime.

Enter your email address, your first name, and press Submit.

Your Email:
First Name:
Newsletter archive

Infomercial production direct marketing